Study

Research Providers

All-America
2026
October 20, 2026

In 2026, there has been more to the story of U.S. equities than meets the eye. While the year has delivered strong performance, volatility has come in the form of macroeconomic shocks, political uncertainty and the unfettered pace of investment in generative AI.

“The market looked through higher rates, sticky inflation, fiscal pressure, and geopolitical uncertainty—supported by AI-led capex and solid EPS momentum,” according to Ken Goldman, head of North America Equity Research at J.P. Morgan. “AI remained the dominant theme, but the market grew more selective amid crowded positioning.”

For providers of U.S. equity research, this raised demand for high-conviction, stock-specific work, he added. “Work that separates real AI monetization from narrative, identifies supplier leverage and revision potential, and flags where expectations have moved ahead of fundamentals,” he said. Additionally, cross-asset collaboration also mattered more as clients looked for integrated views across sectors and asset classes.

U.S. Sell-Side Research Rises to the Challenge
U.S. Sell-Side Research Rises to the Challenge October 20, 2026
The 2026 All-America Research Hall of Fame: Carrying the Torch
The 2026 All-America Research Hall of Fame: Carrying the Torch October 20, 2026
Methodology summary
Background

2026 marks the 55th year of the All- America Research Team and eighth year for publication of the survey’s commission-weighted results (previous years’ results were weighted by companies’ assets under management). This commission-weighted approach more accurately reflects how the buy-side values and rewards the sell-side for their research advisory services.  

Selection Criteria 

To select the members of the All-America Research Team, Extel solicited opinions of directors of research and investment professionals at asset management firms. We received responses from 4,451 individuals at 1,608 firms. The names of individuals surveyed are kept confidential to ensure their continuing cooperation.

Participants rated their top firms in each sector and then separately rated individual analysts at those firms to create two distinct rankings for each sector. A numerical score was produced by weighing each vote based on the responding firm’s US commissions and the average rating awarded.  This created the US Commission-weighted Leader table rankings.

Using those scores, ranks were determined. Firms/Analysts were designated runners-up when their score came within 35 percent of the third-place scores. For the analyst rankings, individuals who switched firms after May 26th are cited at their previous organizations. Voters must meet strict eligibility requirements, and winners must achieve a minimum vote count. All ballots are subject to review by the Research Operations Group.  

Survey Information